TrainNet.org        Everything on a Flanged Wheel       

Message Boards
Weekly Moderated Conferences



Subject: "Degrees curvature versus radius in feet"     Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy     Email this topic to a friend    
Conferences HO Scale Topic #37
Reading Topic #37
jlauterbach

 
Click to EMail jlauterbach Click to send private message to jlauterbach Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list
 
Member since 17-Jun-03
"Degrees curvature versus radius in feet"
01-Jun-04, 08:02 AM (MST)
I have an old New York Central specification sheet for the ALCO RS-3 that lists the sharpest curve that the engine could operate on was 21 degrees. What is the radius in feet for a 21-degree curve? Looking to make sure that I have something akin to realism in next rebuild of HO layout.

John Lauterbach
Macon, GA


 

Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Corkyteam

 
Click to EMail Corky Click to send private message to Corky Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM
 
Member since 26-Oct-01
1. "RE: Degrees curvature versus radius in feet"
01-Jun-04, 04:33 PM (MST)
In response to message #0
 
John,

I can't answer your question directly, I'll say that up front. It seems to me though, that the distance of a curve in feet versus degrees would change with the elevation of the track and track speed. A 21° curve would be shorter if the allowed speed was 30mph as opposed to 60mph or if the track was banked rather than flat.

That's just off the top of my head. Comments?

Corky


 

Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
jlauterbach

 
Click to EMail jlauterbach Click to send private message to jlauterbach Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list
 
Member since 17-Jun-03
2. "RE: Degrees curvature versus radius in feet"
06-Jun-04, 06:30 PM (MST)
In response to message #1
 
I had the answer to my question in my home library. One of my "treasures" is a Fairbanks-Morse brochure entitled, "The Lackawanna Story." Brochure was a sales piece for the F-M Train Master, which was not a small locomotive (around 67 feet over couplers) for the time. F-M gave the following specs for curvature:

Minimum radius of curvature = 191' (30 degrees)

Minimum radius of curvatuer, locomotive coupled to AAR 40'6" freight car = 212' (27 degrees)

With HO-scale, 212' radius is about 29 inches. Next train table will have to be somewhat bigger. My current layout has most curves with 22 or 24 inch radii.

John


 

Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic